Black Ops 2 Dev Teases Another Gun for Black Ops 2 “Buried” Zombies DLC Map

Recently on twitter, Treyarch’s Game Design Director, David “Vahn” Vonderharr teased the possibility of another gun to launch along side the Ray Gun Mark II in the upcoming Black Ops 2 Vengeance Map Pack Zombies Map “Buried.”

Screen Shot 2013-06-18 at 5.45.03 PM

He also revealed that if you own the Vengeance Map Pack, the Ray Gun Mark II will be available in all of the previous Zombies Maps.

The Vengeance Map Pack is slated for release on July 2nd for Xbox 360 First. We will have more information on the release date of the map pack for PlayStation 3 and PC as it is released.

  • Onlyoneopinion

    So, Maybe the 4th Dlc, are 4 zombies maps, and 1 multiplayer ?
    Like Rezurrection in Bo, it’s a good idea i think :)

    • alexbegt

      I would love all zombie maps.

      • Emre

        Why would i buy the season pass for old zombie maps that i already own stupid nerd.

        • Raymond Featherston

          Because maybe he wants to play them on BO2, and use the BO2 guns on them? Did you ever consider that maybe he does not own the old maps, and would therefor enjoy getting them, or that maybe his BO1 broke and he can no longer play them, or that it is near to impossible to get a game on those maps on BO1. If any thing your the stupid one here considering you have to resort to name calling to make your point because you lack the understanding of other people’s situations and facts to actually argue your point.

          • Kishan Amin

            clam down but yea what they said!

  • MegaMan3k

    Am I out of place to say …
    Who cares about new zombies guns?

    • AtheistMason

      And they didn’t even bother to infrom them in previous trailers.. Now they are bringing it up, imagine what’s going on

    • killzoner

      On this site, no, as this site is dominated by BF fanboys. But the COD zombie fans is one big community in itself.

      • AtheistMason

        Site dominated by BF fanboys cant agree more!!

    • WarBroh

      Apparently, all the 12 year old hot pocket eaters that play CoD.

      • dieger

        but i like hot pockets ;_;

    • DanDustEmOff

      I lost interest in zombies at launch. No private match and leader boards that stop registering when someone leaves or gets disconnected instantly ruined it.

      • Aaron Williams

        Private match only matters if your a high rounder. It’s a big deal but not an interest loser. And rounds stop counting after someone leaves is one of the best things ever you stupid moron!

        If i play 10 hours and my friend lags out its all wasted. Lol that sounds good to you maybe but not me.

        • DanDustEmOff

          Are you retarded? How is it better? I have lost count of the amount of times that some one has left at round 20 because they keep going down forcing everyone else to quit the game. Why should your shitty internet ruin everone elses hard work. You make idiotic comments like that then have the nerve to call me a moron.

          • Aaron Williams

            We’ll 1st off your 1st mistake is trying to get high rounds with randoms. i play’d a 9 hour game with four people getting number one in the world at one point. And if it wasent for the new auto save when someone leaves it wouldent have counted. He accidently opened his disc tray thanks to Microsofts brillant new console……. idiots.

            Not to mention since there are multiple player count leaderboards this is needed to stop people from using player count glitches to get higher leaderboards.

            You are a moron. Like i said i lost so many high rounds back on black ops 1 and now i atleast get to keep the number one BO2. Excluding all the wasted time of trying to get into a match without private match, idiots at idiotarch.

            • DanDustEmOff

              First off even trying to get to high rounds with friends has been fucked up so many times by people being disconnected, nevermind the fact that it can be difficult at times to get a full lobby together without arranging a day and time thats suitable for everyone and ensuring everone has 10 hours+ to spare.

              As far as No1 in the world proof or STFU. Like I said all the system has to do is record a number thats it there is no reason why it shouldn’t be able to record the highest round for the guy who left at the round he left and keep the counter going for everone else.

              Treyarch are just too stupid and lazy to fix their broken shit to make the game playable for the masses of loyal fans. Your argument in itself is moronic, all they had to do was keep private match and have good working leaderboards. I never once lost a high round in WaW or Blops 1 due to someone being disconnected and there is no excuse or argument that you can offer to why this is the case in Blops2.

            • Aaron Williams

              If one person backs out and the rounds continue then more problems will come up. The way it is, is surprisingly good.

              SO let me get this straight when u play for an hour in a 4 player game one guy lags out but never on WAW or BO1 no ever lagged out? Lol defeating yourself.

              Keeping Private match??? Why so people can pick how many players they want to play with? Why? Let the industry dictate everything! Just like the Kinect. Always power to government and corporations….. Who knows the log for getting rid of Private match… It has to be it was to simple and actually worked well. So treyarch didnt want Activsion to think they had brain cells so they took it out so they could get paid more.

              So you think you start with 4 players get to 20 one guy leaves he gets a round 20 4players leaderboard then the 3 play until 30 he gets a 30 on round 30, and each time someone backs out the game takes away there zombie addition due to player count? So so on?

              ….. If it worked right.. maybe. My point is its way better than BO1 system of one person leaves its all wasted. Your solution is fixing the major problem. While 3arc patched BO1 problem. It had to be fixed because of the new leaderboards.

              What you want is something 3arc could never do because it makes to much sense! Are you smart or just smarter than morons??? What your asking for is when someone backs out the game basiclly starts counting as 3 players without glitches and the game registering it. You know it wouldent work because 3arc cant even make maps without glitches and hit a to jump icons… idiots.

            • DanDustEmOff

              How would one player leaving mess things up? People used to leave in Blops1 all the time, the score would still go up. It was also easier to get a 2 player game. In Blops 2 it won’t start until you have 4 which is really annoying.

              I don’t know why you keep bringing glitches into it they have the means to watch high round games and remove people exploiting glitches from the board.

              Do you get how it worked in Blops1? If someone left the game carried on and so did the leaderboard count it was not wasted at all. Some of you arguments make little to no sense. Is English your main language?

              Yes when one person leaves that round gets recorded to their GT everyone else gets to carry on playing and it records whatever round the others players get to on their board.

              Its not difficult its how it works now and its the way it was intended to work, it just took them 8 months to figure out how to fix a simple leaderboard glitch. Which supports my point they ruined zombies with shit boards and no private match.

            • Aaron Williams

              There are ways around the player count thing. But not having a private match is a huge problem. But i can get into 2 player games it takes some brain cell power and luck. And when someone left in bo1 i always worried about player count zombie total. And now with more leader boards when someone backs out it be a big problem if the game continued to count.

              Because 3arc is lazy and glitches ruin the competitiveness and thats the only reason why i got so into zombies.

              But bo2 leader boards and BO1 are different. And since 3arc made the game there would be more problems if they didnt FIX the people leaving outta games.

              Wait if you start up a 4 person and someone leaves your rounds continue to count in the lobby? And if you get to round 30 with 3 people when you started with 4 it will count the round to the 4 player leaderboard? Thus ending this whole debate because they changed it already and i didnt know it?

            • DanDustEmOff

              I see what you mean about the player count now but the traps are an easy solution, Ascention also had the centrafuge in the start room to use as a free trap.

              No if someone leaves it counts the round they left at on the 4 player leader board (if that is your highest round) and the three of you continue on the three player leaderboard.

              Well so I have been told, I have lost interest and only play the DLC maps a few times just to get some value from the season pass.

            • Aaron Williams

              I should test to see if its true then. add me on xbox if u want. i need good people for buried.

            • DanDustEmOff

              I dont get on Xbox much anymore but I will play Buried when it launches. Feel free to add me I am on the same name as I am on here.

            • Aaron Williams

              As far as proof? Lol check my twitter gangstaaaron7 or find me at my email that name at yahoo

              I tied relaxing day 2 or 3 i think round 56 mob of the dead. 9 hours. And at one time i had a super high 4 player 9 hour game.

              Of coarse id take pics,

            • DanDustEmOff

              Do you mean relaxing end? Offer me proof GT or PSN Id and ill check you out.

            • Aaron Williams

              Btw ur if some backs out it keeps counting leaderboard thingy, thats not true. Never trust humans.

              Of coarse the only relaxing tbag there is. Proof is on my twitter dude.

            • DanDustEmOff

              So they still haven’t fixed it lol trust Treyarch to fuck a good game up.

            • Aaron Williams

              Like i said if it was in the game i doubt it would work right. And everything would be complicated because say u get to a 50 4 player one drops and you get to 51 with 3 your 4 player leaderboard would be higher. So id be pist.

            • Aaron Williams

              They fucked up the moment someone thought it be a good idea to get rid of Private Match

      • Christopher Cioffi

        Turns out if you are playing zombies and the host leaves and it does a host migration, it still saves! it happened when i played at mob of the dead. the kid left at round 25, so we decided lets just continue there’s no point in quting at this point. We died at round 34, and i realized it saved with 3 people instead of 4

        • DanDustEmOff

          Thats new then it never used to. Still by the Mob of the Dead I had totally gave up on Treyarch. I might give it another look now though. Thanks for the Intel

  • zacflame

    in the end, it doesn’t even matter.
    black ops 2 zombies is shitty.
    the only way to revive it is with A7X, and then to remove the shitty new characters; for a starter.

    • Lestat87

      So BO1 zombies was way better? I’ve stopped buying cods with mw3. Disappointed to many times.

      • dieger

        way better?….eh debatable BO1 zombies is A LOT more arcade-y it had some hits but a lot of misses. but it was way better then that green run shit

        • DanDustEmOff

          Not debatable BO2 ruined zombies no private match crap leaderboards.

          • dieger

            i was talking about BO1 but ok

          • Lol

            “Custom Games” is private match. You sure you’re not just talking out of your ass?

            • DanDustEmOff

              Custom games is not private match. Private match had no settings to change other than the map. Two or three players could make a game and have it count on the leader board. Custom game allows you to change various settings and does not count towards the leader board.

              So by the title being custom you can tell that its different from private.

            • yourmazzter

              Do you not understand even though its customized its still a fucking private match. You’re not playing in an actual lobby its something you put together to play privately. Private matches of any gamemode do not count toward the leaderboards in multiplayer or zombies so wtf are you talking about.

            • DanDustEmOff

              They did in Blops 1.

            • Morgan Freeman

              IT’S ABOUT IT COUNTING. Leaderboards in this game don’t fucking work, you have to play pubs which is stupid as fuck.

            • yourmazzter

              Why the hell would they allow it so you can be put on the leaderboards on a private match it doesn’t count for a reason if you cant do it in multiplayer why would they make it available in zombies that’s dumb as fuck

            • Raymond Featherston

              Actually on a technicality it is (technically) a “private” match, seeing as how it is the opposite of a public match seeing as how no randoms can join it and it can be invite restricted. One of the antonyms of public is private, so therefor it is private. Whatever your opinion is of the whole leaderboard thing is, it does not change that it is technically a private match. My point here is that just because your results do not show up on a leaderboard does not make the match any less “private”. Of course I’m speaking in technicalities here and you are entitled to your opinion, but the thing is by definition it is a private match and the change of features does not change this.

            • DanDustEmOff

              Thing is I have lost count of the amount of times I have had idiots join from my friends, friends list because they forgot to make it “private”.

              Therefore I do not see it as private, you can make it private IF you set up the game. So to me it is not truly a private match. But I see your point.

          • Raymond Featherston

            Actually it is debatable, lets revert back to the argument you had about the difference between opinions and facts shall we? I could care less about leaderboards thing (and I know some others may or may not agree), but the point of playing a game is to have fun and not being put on some leaderboard. If I’m having fun I could not care less about where I am on some leaderboard. But my point here is that just because you dislike that particular feature, does not mean it is a non-debatable fact, seeing as how I just debated it you were proven wrong on that point.

            • DanDustEmOff

              The point of playing a game is also to win. Crap leaderboards ruin fun too.

            • Raymond Featherston

              Thats objective, because I can almost guarantee you that I could find a good portion of people who could not care less about that stuff. To me its the fun of playing the game, I actually get bored “trying” to get to higher rounds. Like I said you can have your opinion, but it definitely does not apply to everyone. Oh there is a reason why those games do not go to leaderboards, just so you know.

            • DanDustEmOff

              You could they are the people that go after round 15 because they keep going down. You may get bored some of us don’t. Why should we be punished because you get bored and leave the game?

              The leader boards were good as they were. There was no need to change them. If people dont care about them then the change does nothing to help them either.

            • Raymond Featherston

              While I agree that it was not a needed and maybe a bad change (that is objective of course), my point was that having your score on the leaderboards should not be the factor that makes the game fun or not. The gameplay should be the primary factor of fun (IMO), not some leaderboard hardly anybody ever looks at. And you presume the only people who do not care are the rage quitters, and of course that is partially true. However some people (like myself) do enjoy playing the game, and getting to high rounds but could care less that Jim Bob down in South Carolina can see how high I got (that was an example of course). The reason behind the private match not counting is because you are given the ability to change things (such as starting round, magic, headshots only ect), and leaderboards would only work here if they made a separate board for each combination of options which is unreasonable. My point here is that you should not act as if the leaderboard issue is a gamebreaking thing, enjoy the mode for the fun it provides during gameplay hating on a game that has (IMO) decent gameplay (zombies mode not MP) just because the leaderboards are wonky. Lets say the MP game you were most exited about right now came out, and you loved the gameplay, would you honestly talk about it like you are about zombies (you talk about how awful it is, and your primary argument was the leaderboards) just because it has wonky leaderboards, or is this argument a COD only thing?

            • DanDustEmOff

              If my favorite MP game came out and if everytime someone left mid game and I lost all progression in that game XP, weapon XP etc… then yes I would call it a game breaker.

              In Zombies you dont level up you go for the highest round you can achieve, thats the whole idea. There is nothing else to achieve in zombies.

              Without the leader board the whole game seems kind of pointless. The leader board makes the game competitive. If it is broken then it is no longer competitive.

              The inital “yay I’m killing zombies” only keeps you entertained for so long, thats why games have leaderboards at all. Without them we would all get bored pretty quickly.

            • Raymond Featherston

              Change “we would all” to “some people” because frankly like I said I can guarantee you that a decent portion of the community could care less about leaderboards and their round record does not matter while disproving that statement. How often do you think people actually sit their and say “Wow look at (insert your username here)’s score”, point being isn’t it also pointless if nobody sees it or even cares what round you got? Yes it’s on the board, but the competitive edge as you say is taken away when a good portion of the community never even looks at the thing. If a game is good then some minor thing like your score going on a board that nobody looks at or generally cares about should make it bad. Why do you play single player games then, because there is no visible way for people to track what you did? I understand that it is your opinion, but I am having trouble understanding the leaderboards>gameplay logic.

            • DanDustEmOff

              Ok so you would still play MP on BF or CoD, if you were permanently stuck at rank 15 because people leave mid game? I have been playing Zombies since Nacht first landed and have many freinds that have also. Everyone I play with feels the same. Go on the forums from before it was fixed, full of people who feel the same way. People that don’t care are a small minority. All it needs to do is record one piece of information. Its not a huge ask for the game to record the last round. So to have to wait for 8 months for them to fix it is just inexcusable.

          • Aaron Williams

            whats wrong with the leaderboards? everyone is a glitcher now? just like bo1?

            • DanDustEmOff

              The fact that they do not reflect the highest round you got, merely the point that someone got disconnected or left. I have been told that this has been fixed now but 8 months in is way to late for this to have been fixed.

    • Raymond Featherston

      I sense opinions here that you are trying to place on everybody here, hmmm………………

    • Aaron Williams

      Lol semi agree but Mob and Grief mode for it is amazing

  • http://www.facebook.com/TheNeoReaper Chad Eugene Rash

    Instead of adding new guns how about fixing the damn sniper rifles.

    • MegaMan3k

      What’d they do to them?

      • Lol

        Nothing. He’s just bitching for the sake of bitching, that’s all.

        • Morgan Freeman

          Bitching for the sake of bitching, that is retarded. He is ‘bitching’ (he is actually pointing out a flaw in the game he’d like fixed) because something in the game is broken, which I agree with. Snipers and pistols are the cheesiest shit ever in BO2.

  • Blaine Reinsma

    this is news? Literally ever new zombie map comes with new weapons. Why would anyone act like this is special? and yeah like others said, these new characters are laaaame.

    • killzoner

      The new ray gun mark 2 will be available in all previous zombie maps to replace the old ray gun. This means you can pick up the ray gun mark 2 in motd, tranzit, etc. and because the new ray gun is much more powerful then it will be interesting to use it in the old maps.

      And Vond just want to emphasize that there will be a new wonder weapon in buried because peopple speculate the ray gun mark 2 is the new wonder weapon.

      • Laser0pz

        Oh my god don’t tell me they’re replacing it!? At least add it to the box, don’t take out ol’ Ray!

        • Kishan Amin

          nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

    • DanDustEmOff

      Its a new effin ray gun of course its news.

  • z0ml3ie P1kachu

    yet they can’t add new guns to mp due to lack of space…. I’m confused at logic. O.o

    • DanDustEmOff

      A mp gun has attachments camouflage and a leveling up system. A gun in zombies is just vanilla and PaP so used less ram.

  • dieger

    “the Ray Gun Mark II will be available in all of the previous Zombies Maps.” this confuses me if its in all the other maps what happens if a non DLC owner gets it??? and what about mob of the dead the map is like full to the brim they had to take boards off the windows to get it playable.

    • Mitch

      A non DLC owner simply can’t get it. They just can’t get it out of the Random Box.

      • dieger

        how would that work?

        • Mitch

          Simple, lets say we play TranZit. If I use the box, I might have a slight chance to get the Ray Gun Mark II, but you have 0 chance. The next patch simply patches in the Ray Gun Mark II so everyone can see it, but the DLC actually unlocks it, just like with the Peacekeeper.

          • dieger

            huh i guess that would work

      • nightwing

        they can get it, the patch prior to DLC release has the information in there, for compatibiity purposes. thats how the peacekeeper works and how BF3 have done their gun docs

        • Mitch

          That’s because the peacekeeper and BF3 kits can be dropped, but you can’t drop weapons in zombies, can you?

          • nightwing

            its still compatibility, you have this gun, the other people will still see the gun, and see the effects. thats compatibility. has nothing to do with them using the weapon.

  • Mitch

    Hopefully it will be an old school wonder weapon. Low ammo, extremely powerful, out of the box (not buildable). The Jet Gun just sucked, the Sliquifier was a buildable and the blundergat is just a shotgun.

    • Aaron Williams

      No , no more guns that make glitchers the top high rounders. Only VR11 scavenger style guns

  • Pingback: Gamer Assault Weekly | News- Reviews – Releases

  • Ghost

    how do you get it to day

settings

close