Battlefield 4 Official PC System Requirements Revealed

Battlefield 4 developers DICE have laid down the official minimum and recommenced system requirements for the PC version of the game releasing this Fall on October 29.

The info comes from the most recent update on the studio’s Facebook page, which lists the following as benchmarks required in order to play Battlefield 4 on your rig.

BTvVHM9CEAEoz9d

PC System Requirements

Minimum

OS
  • Windows Vista SP2 32-Bit (With KB971512 Platform Update)
Processor
  • AMD Athlon X2 2.8 GHz
  • Intel Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz
Memory
  • 4 GB
Graphics Card
  • AMD Radeon 3870
  • Nvidia Geforce 8800 GT
Graphics Memory
  • 512MB
Hard Drive
  • 30 GB

Recommended

OS
  • Windows 8 64-Bit
Processor
  • AMD Six-C0re CPU
  • Intel Quad-Core CPU
Memory
  • 8 GB
Graphics Card
  • AMD Radeon 7870
  • Nvidia Geforce GT 660
Graphics Memory
  • 3 GB
Hard Drive
  • 30 GB

So, can your rig run Battlefield 4? If you’re not sure, you got until October 29 to make some upgrades. Be sure to keep an eye out for the beta earlier this October.

Thanks, Samuel, for the tip!

  • Mohammed Abbassi

    I don’t get how they choose the recommended card

    • ThePoolshark

      I think that is to run it at all high with good frames. (I may be wrong, though)

  • ThePoolshark

    Pretty much matches speculation. Glad they didn’t make it crazy.

  • Wiking

    Just me who thinks that “Recommended requirements” are low?

    Not saying it’s a bad thing, but from what we’ve seen so far I kinda expected higher. But I am glad it’s not : D

    • xHDx

      Yes I think it looks low. I have pretty much the recommended specs. I have:
      2500K i5
      GTX 660Ti w/ 2GB
      8GB RAM.

      Thought I would need much higher than current specs. They recommend 3GB of graphical RAM and the Ti version of the 660 has only 2GB :(

      • Cody_Murphy

        my 660ti has 3GB so im good

    • jaskdavis

      Yep I remember DICE stating that FB3 was better optimized then FB2 so I would not expect a huge difference in recommendations between BF3 and BF4.

  • Thomas Horsburgh

    I’m not upgrading from my 570 until Nvidia’s Maxwell cards are out.

  • luke hobson

    built a pc just for bf4
    check it out
    http://uk.pcpartpicker.com/p/1Bq6q
    pictures http://imgur.com/a/EPZgg#0

    • dieger

      good god that price…

      • luke hobson

        Every penny well spent for bf3/bf4

      • pot51e

        Don’t worry about it. I just built one this week for BF4; Specs are as recommended (except instead of a 3Gb 660, I got a 2Gb overclocked 670) – all up (including SSD) = £660. Only reusable parts were a 500Gb 2nd disk, keyboard and mouse.

    • DanDustEmOff

      Nice here is mine

      • dieger

        that’s a damn big case…

        • DanDustEmOff

          Its massive, very cool though.

          • pot51e

            Pun intended?

      • Matt

        Does that Power supply make the bird noises too when the fan kicks in?

        • DanDustEmOff

          Yeah, I’m running windows 95 too.

      • Guest

        Here is mine.

      • luke hobson

        nice! is that the stock cpu fan?
        whats that like
        i just bought a arctic cooling freezer 13

        • DanDustEmOff

          Yeah I haven’t needed to overclock it yet. I am gonna stick with the stock and water cool it when I need to overclock it. The CPU is an i7 3770k, it’s easily handling everything I’ve thrown at it so far. Even Crysis 3 plays at 50 – 60 fps maxed out.

          • luke hobson

            holy sh*t really…? nice!
            sadly my build isnt complete yet, i still have to get my ssd & hdd (later this week)
            just put my new cpu cooler on today

            • DanDustEmOff

              Yeah I built the system with Crysis in mind. My thinking was that if it can handle that maxed out it will be good for 3-4 years before I need a new pair of cards. I do wish I had of waited for the Nvidia 7 series cards to launch though.
              Nice build mate, I’m playing the waiting game for a good SSD. Prices are starting to fall when they are at £200 for a 500gb I am gonna snap one up. I just can’t justify £300 for a drive, when a 1 TB drive is £80.

            • luke hobson

              wow that’s a huge case!
              what keyboard & mouse are you using ?

            • DanDustEmOff

              Cheap and cheerful they all do the same job. The keyboard is a Logitec and the mouse is a no name. Frankly I’ve had enough of expensive mice. They break half the time and I don’t really think they give that much of an advantage, unless you play mmorgs.

    • Just saying

      I’m not in the mood to build a PC for it so I preordered PS4 and luckily PS4 meets the recommended requirements and slightly passes it :)

    • V3N0M

      :O I just bought the exact same GPU a month ago! It is a sexy card. All in preparation of BF4 ofcourse :)

      • luke hobson

        my build is incomplete!
        hows the graphics card working for you?

        • V3N0M

          I know its a bit of an internet cliche but it runs like a beast.
          Really impressed with it coming from a 570. The temps are great and I had great results in the BF4 alpha. avg ~60+(max 80+) fps(i think mostly on ultra) on 1080p. It’s a really great card.

  • Tyler Dominick

    I hope these are NOT correct.. if so as a PC gamer ( NO not even high end PC) this is very disappointing. They are NOT even much diff. when compared to BF3, that is sad. They were supposed to be 64-bit ONLY on Frostbite 3. I was also hoping that this would be ONLY DX-11 as well (as DX 11 has been out for what, 5 years). Very sad day.. the min. specks are the EXACT same as BF3, such a let down. ANYONE who is playing any recent game should not be using a graphics card that came out over 6 years ago ( aka 8800 gt and Ati 3 series ) this is just a slap in the face. A gaming rig, or anything that you play modern games on, that is not running a x64 OS and a DX11 card is a joke of a PC.

    • xHDx

      I would have to agree. These specs seem way to low for such a high end game. I know for a fact my 660Ti will not run this game on max @60FPS.

      • SamRock

        And engine is considered great when it can show its awesomeness on all type of setup. This allows developers to cater all kind of audience.

        I think DICE has done a great job in being able to support older GPUs even with the latest engine. Shows how greatly the engine is optimized

    • jaskdavis

      Or it’s just the Fact that FB3 is better optimized and not as taxing on hardware as FB2 was… ;)

    • Matt

      They made FB3 for scalability… just because it can run on lower spec systems it doesn’t mean it’ll look anywhere close to the max out. You should respect the fact that they are supporting such low end rigs instead of forcing an upgrade upon everyone that wants to play it.

    • SamRock

      FB3 engine is greatly optimized. I was able to get decent FPS on my 3 year old(or 2?) ATI 5670 graphic card on the Alpha trail.

      I think the game is going to look highly detailed even on a mid-end GFX card

    • Charles Crowe

      Those next gen consoles that cant compete with quad core PCs are what held it back. Already its showing to be inferior on PS4 and it hasn’t even released yet

      http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/08/23/gamescom-battlefield-4s-graphics-lacking-on-ps4

      • Tyler D

        That article is a opinion and a bad one at that. The game is not done being optimized yet on Next gen as DICE has said this a thousand times. Here is a article that a guy has a completely different opinion than the one in your article.

        http://blog.us.playstation.com/2013/08/22/hands-on-battlefield-4-on-ps4/

        • Charles Crowe

          Yeah of course they have a different opinion. They are a Playstation blog. Like they would actually admit the game is inferior… Nice try dude but come back when you have something credible. Btw its not an opinion the game doesn’t match up to PC. I can understand your confusion though. You actually think the Playstation blog is the place to go to for unbiased opinion.

        • Charles Crowe

          If you want a real opinion you have to go to Nintendo sites, Everyone knows WiiU is the strongest console on the market. Ps4 and Xbone couldnt dream of being as powerful as it. If you dont like the WiiU then your biased and I wont talk to you, Also if you like Ps4 then you must be a fanboy cause only fanboys like Ps4 this is my way of thinking.

          • KevinMcClintock

            No more than fanboys like it. Just fanboys are the only ones that think its a super computer when its using a mobile chip.
            Only fanboys think specs matter.
            Only fanboys blindly believe their chosen company because they don’t know anything about tech themselves.

      • Bob Gulihan
    • Tyler Dominick

      I dont mean to cut people out.. but to be the best/most optimised game possiable they should make it only x64 and only DX11 ( x64 has been out since XP, and DX 11 will be going on 5, yes, 5 years old.. just sad to see its such on the lower end. I really am most upset with the x64 not being there)

      • pot51e

        Well you’ll probably see the same degree of variance you’d get between PS3 and PS4; 32bit W7 or 64bit W8. BTW, DX11 hasnt been out 5 years, and DX11.1 (where the real goodness happens) has only been out a year.

        • Tyler Dominick

          Sorry, 4 years it has been out…

    • Ryan Merrifield

      You’re complaining about the best looking Military FPS on the market? And that the minimum specs are too low? Sorry everyone doesn’t have enough money to go out and spend thousands on a new gaming rig so they can run BF4 on ultra. That’s why I’m getting a PS4.

      Also, the higher the minimum specs, the less of a market Dice will have which means less money. And yeah, they are first and foremost making this product to make money. I know that comes as a shock to some people who think the devs are just out to get them.

      I pride myself on never blowing up in comments (if you don’t believe me check), but this is rediculous. People like you give PC players a bad name, and fit the stereotypical “PC master race, everyone else is inferior” mold. I wish I didn’t have to say that, but its true. In all, stop complaining. The game is going to look spectacular on what I assume is your master race PC rig you spent un-godly amounts of money constructing so you could run games on max settings.

  • SamRock

    Hey Dave!!

    Thanks for the mention :)

    • V3N0M

      Awesome man. The GPU is sort of like the bane of a PC Gamers rig hehe
      I managed to secure myself a GTX 770 and in South Africa it cost me about 50% of my entire rig’s value…Always the hardest part to find a balance with but good luck man. BF4 here we come

      • SamRock

        Thank You!! Yes selecting a GPU is always a pain .. so I have left the GPU purchase for the end… will see if anything new is introduced or if there will be price drops on existing cards :D

        I am so glad that BF4 with FB3 engine is able to support even low end card (minimum req). That mean… we have wide range of options without necessarily burning holes in our pockets :)

        What card do you suggest? I am really not looking for a High end cards and dont see myself playing any other games apart from BF. Of course there are always gems like Dishonored and alikes..hehe

        • V3N0M

          Cool man. I don’t always keep up with GPU news/prices but for that sort of range I would say the 660 should do fairly well(as well as not costing a small fortune). The first thing i did when i got my 770 was play the BF4 alpha and got some pretty great results at standard 1080p. I don’t know too much about AMD but a card of the equivalent power might save you a little bit more but still provide some great performance.

  • jaskdavis

    I know this is PC but….
    Xbox One:
    OS: Windows 8.1 (DX11.2) 64bit
    Processor: Custom AMD Jaguar 8 Core
    Memory: 8gb
    Graphics Card: Custom AMD “Target” Radeon 7850ish
    Hard Drive: 500gb

    PS4:
    OS: Custom (OpenGL) 64bit
    Processor: AMD Jaguar 8 Core
    Memory: 8gb
    Graphics Card: Custom AMD “Target” Radeon 7870ish
    Hard Drive: 500gb

    Sooo…. Both Systems fall under Recommended Specs!
    I can’t wait to see how much better battlefield looks on Next Gen vs Current! :D

    • SamRock

      I m sure there will be great difference. Current gen will be almost if not exactly like BF3

      • jaskdavis

        Yep, Im mainly looking forward to Higher Resolutions, greater Texture Draw/Load Distance, 64 Players, and of course 60 FPS!

        • SamRock

          yes!!! its going to be great! :)

        • http://rmdclan.com/ CmdrVOODOO

          Think about how far below minimum specs the PS3 and 360 were/are. It’s going to be night and day different.

        • CoDforever

          Why are ppl making such a big deal of 64 players 60 fpswhen its already been on pc from atleast bf3 in 2011 im a cod fan i dont go bragging about 60 fps on consoles every year

          • WarHero

            I’ll answer for you, yes beefy PCs can run BF at 60fps at ease but this conversation is about the consoles. For years Graphically Hungry games on consoles ran 30FPS for years now jumping to Next Gen BF games which is 60FPS and 64players is a big leap against current gen. I don’t know if you notice but 64players and 60FPS with destruction on consoles says alot.

            • Tyler D

              Could not have said it better myself.

            • Zé do Boné

              I play BF3 Ultra settings 60fps with a 770 4gb on my 60″ and it’s so beautiful.. I’m so excited and can’t wait for BF4 beta!! My system is better then the recommended That game and GTAV will take over my life :/ oh and If I played on my 23″ 3D monitor I can play at 120fps and it’s so damn smooth..lol Consoles and those old computer parts :p all you guys are doing is buying a old computer in a smaller case that looks sleek and compact..

            • Bob Gulihan

              I will translate your comment.

              I AM A PC GOD AND YOU WILL OBEY EVERY THING I SAY BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAA.

              Meanwhile consoles gets tons of exclusives PC will never get.
              Also enjoy playing only one game on your inferior computer that actually uses all that power.

            • WarBroh

              Consoles get tons of exclusives PC will never get, what like Titanfall?

              OH wait (ouch)

            • http://www.facebook.com/datkidfromawendaw Clay Johnson

              Nah more like Quantum Break, The Order 1886, Infamous Second Son and the like. Its cool though, I have a decent enough rig not to miss out on PC exclusive games.

            • jakalakn

              When your running BF4…or any next gen game.. at 120FPS on Ultra Settings. Give us a shout… qued

            • http://www.facebook.com/datkidfromawendaw Clay Johnson

              And have no issue running every game made for it. That’s most important.

        • acealchemist

          60 FPS? Pfff that’s for noobs. 120 Fps ftw! Lol i’m jk about the noob part, but seriously… 120 fps o_o”

          • B_Boss

            Don’t be “that guy” lol…PC is going to be awesome, Nextgen is going to be awesome.

    • Tyler D

      Here is My thoughts on ps4 version.

      64 players running on medium to high settings all running at 60fps for only 400 dollars. Why the Fuck would anybody bitch about that.

      But really though does the next gen consoles not exceed the recommended requirements so why would there be any compromises?

      • http://rmdclan.com/ CmdrVOODOO

        That’s how my PC runs BF3 (mostly medium/some high), and it looks amazing compared to how it looks on my 360.

        • B_Boss

          Yeah but I bet it generally ‘feels’ and plays the same. The core gameplay is present on all platforms. The moment THAT starts to change? I’m done with the ‘weakest’ and would go for the platform that offers the most optimum performance.

          • Oblivion_Lost667

            Core gameplay yes, but features no, the different between the 64 player and 32 player servers, even with the smaller maps on consoles, is a lot different, consoles feel a lot more empty in comparison. Though, TDM and CQ (although there are 64 player CQ servers, but that just turns into a shitfest.) gameplay’s pretty much the same.

            • B_Boss

              Well….that seems questionable to me, especially being a PS3 AND 360 player. People give into all of this drivel thinking that console maps are smaller = less fun in battle lol. If that were true I think my stats would speak to that end but it is not. DICE really knows how to scale the game down well.

              There is an obvious and glaring difference between 32 and 64, I get that but its relative to each console. Consoles with its 24 max players still have a damned great time. Other than map sizes and player counts there aren’t really relevant features missing and core gameplay in generally what matters.

              Again, when you’re comparing consoles to PC for that reason I bet there is a difference but consoles player size is awesome relative to console. In the end, there won’t be too much of a difference in features other than textures, maybe some options here and there with Nextgen and PC

            • Oblivion_Lost667

              I’ve played both PC and the 360 version, and the PC version feels a lot better/action packed in comparison to 360, at least on the larger maps (Caspian Border, Operation Firestorm, etc.). I’m not saying that purely 360 isn’t fun, it still is, but comparing large maps to large maps on the two platforms it doesn’t feel near as good, it ends feeling like it was developed for PC and then they attempted at slimming down the maps, but they didn’t do the slimming down very well, or perhaps it’s the fact that they didn’t develop the maps in mind for consoles, and the consoles ended with left overs.

              Of course, Xbox One/PS4 aren’t going to be hindered by this, since they have the technology to run the same maps/player count as PC.

    • http://rmdclan.com/ CmdrVOODOO

      It will be good enough that it will look as good or better than on my PC. I’d rather play shooters on console because it’s where my friends are and because I’m more comfortable with a controller.

      It’s nice to know I have the option of playing on my PC without doing any sort of upgrades though.

    • Tyler D

      It will make jaws drop that is for sure. All these people saying it will not look good is either trolls or retarded. Remember the beta for current gen of BF3 that looked horrible and DICE plainly said that the textures and graphics was not even in the Beta. Same here, DICE has said countless times to reporters that BF4 is still being optimized for Next gen consoles and that is why they have really not showed it or released any resolution info. It will look amazing especially if you are coming from current gen BF to next gen BF.

    • Aria68

      PS4′s Dualshock 4 is gonna be amazing… tilt the controller to go peak n lean or hear the bullet whizzing by your ear from the speaker on it!

      • http://www.facebook.com/datkidfromawendaw Clay Johnson

        Did Sony incorporate SIXAXIS in DS4? I didn’t know that.

        • Aria68

          SIXAXIS in DS3 was SH*T, barely used in any games … DS4 will have a very sensitive and responsive Gyroscope similar to iPhone! something that actually can be used!

  • Wrathchildx666x

    I built my pc a month ago. Glad to see it meets the recommended requirements.

  • iSpiRiiT

    i have 4 gb ram and can’t upgrade. Would the ram usage be too high while i’m playing?.

  • http://rmdclan.com/ CmdrVOODOO

    Well that’s good news. I’m above on most of the recommended hardware. I only have a GTX 550 Ti in my PC, but I’m able to run BF3 on mostly med/ some high settings and get 60+ FPS.

    OS = Windows 8
    PROCESSOR = Intel Core (Quad Core) i5-4670K
    MEMORY = 16 GB
    GRAPHICS CARD = GTX 550Ti

    I don’t see spending the $$$ to upgrade it as long as it will run games like it’s able to now. Honestly, it looks good enough for me. When I can no longer play the games I want to play, I’ll upgrade.

  • deltaA320

    Anybody wanna tell if I’m good to run? I mean I’m not good with computers so I’m just reading off my system:
    OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
    Processor: Intel i5-3570K @ 3.4Ghz
    Memory: 8 GB
    Graphics Card: MSI Geforce GTX 670 Power edition OC Edition
    Hard drive: 1 TB
    Is it good enough to run at least Ultra without the Windows 8 Operating system and the CPU? Please be elaborate if anything’s wrong! Thanks!

    • Matt

      Ultra will most likely be tailored to dual GPU solutions… that being said AA and Texture resolution might have to be sacrificed for stable framerates. Your rig will look and perform great with the right settings… no need to upgrade quite yet.

    • Zé do Boné

      don’t go i5.. get an i7 2600k you can easily get it from 3.4 to 4.8 and your graphic card choice should be fine to run everything on ultra no problem.. I wouldn’t go I5 cuz with your graphics card and trying to run everything on ultra could make your computer blue screen.. bottleneck issues.. never go less always go more..

      • DohcHolliday

        Really? You’re messing around right?…smh

      • Simplysqueezed

        What a joke, you do realise the 3570K is far more overclockable and has a much better gaming performance out of the box, not to mention its build being a generation ahead…

      • gatormatt80

        I hate to point out the obvious here, but he wasn’t asking a question on what to buy.

    • DohcHolliday

      I’ll be surprised if you can get 30FPS on medium settings. You need a GTX 690 to at least break 60FPS on a 1280×1024 monitor. I’m sorry dude, but you need some serious modding to do. Ooh and that Intel i5-3570k…throw that crap away! C’mon now, you know most people on here have no clue you’re running an above average rig.

  • XFistsClenchedX

    If Battlefield 4 is anything like Battlefield 3, it is going to be terrible.

    • jaskdavis

      Said no one EVER! ;)

      • XFistsClenchedX

        I just said it. Battlefield 3 is awful.

        • Craig Barlettani

          what a rebel

          • XFistsClenchedX

            Nothing rebellious about it. Battlefield 3 was a massive disappointment. It’s easily the worst Battlefield game I’ve ever played. It’s embarrassing that Battlefield 1943 is better.

            • James Mulhall

              You’re one of the few old BF gamers that realise BF3 wasn’t as good as its said to be. I like BF3, but as a BF game I was disappointed. I have more fun of BF1943 and that game is unbalanced as shit.

        • Tyler D

          Sounds to me like you need to go play something else and quit bashing a game that millions love and play every day. Maybe you just suck so bad at it you do not like it. I have met plenty of people like you.

      • Matt

        Said a lot of people almost constantly… but still doesn’t stop them from playing it.

        • XFistsClenchedX

          I stopped playing it until recently when I ran out of money and had nothing else to play with friends. Now I remember why I won’t be purchasing Battlefield 4 unless they make big changes by fixing the broken netcode, taking away the flashlight shield, fixing the way the guns shoot, etc.

          • Matt

            Outside of the netcode, I don’t understand… My biggest complaint would be the Jet rocket spammers but almost everything else has been addressed. Flashlights work in close quarters but anything else is a giant shoot here prompt.

            • XFistsClenchedX

              Flashlights act as a temporary shield which is bullshit. Some weapons are way too inaccurate. Some weapons are way too powerful. The bloom on some of the weapons is out of control.

            • Matt

              Flashlights don’t block bullets… they just disorient you like in real life. Don’t believe me, have someone shine a mag light in your face from a couple feet… it’s almost the same effect but Military grade tact lights are actually more powerful than those mag lights. I still find it annoying as well but not as bad as it was at launch… I can respect the nod to reality. As for the guns… there’s been so many balance tweaks that I don’t even care anymore, I just shoot until I kill someone. One of the skills you have to develop is learning the recoil and burst patterns for each gun… and yes, some are almost useless but they still kill. I just don’t choose the crappy ones which is why you see a lot of people using the ACW-R or M416.

            • XFistsClenchedX

              The flashlights in the game don’t disorient anything. They just block bullets. Even in broad daylight in the game it works. It’s not a nod to reality. In real life, if you shoot the source of the light, that person will die. In the game, bullets pass through them. I shouldn’t have to use bursts when other people don’t have to.

            • Jamie Marques

              They’re not a temporary shield. they’re a nice big juicy target.

          • Tyler D

            Broken netcode. LOL. You stoned.

  • Guest

    Anybody wanna tell if I’m good to run? I mean I’m not good with computers so I’m just reading off my system:
    OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
    Processor: Intel i5-3570K @ 3.4Ghz
    Memory: 8 GB
    Graphics Card: MSI Geforce GTX 670 Power edition OC Edition
    Hard drive: 1 TB
    Is it good enough to run at least Ultra without the Windows 8 Operating system and the CPU? Please be elaborate if anything’s wrong! Thanks!

    • dumyspeed

      with that card u will play medium/low on fullhd. the rest is ok

      • Matt

        Your low ballin that guess… I’d say Medium/High settings with some ultra.

        • dumyspeed

          how many fps are playable to u DUDE? to be a decently reactivate bf3 need at least 80/90 fps. no way that card could handle it. if u mean 60fps maybe

          • Matt

            I can play BF3 just fine with 60FPS… It’s not like the extra 20-30 FPS makes a difference when you get blown up by a tank or rocket spammed by a jet. I can tell 60hz from 120hz but 60hz still refreshes faster than the brain can react to the changes on screen… it’s just something to gloat about.

            • dumyspeed

              its pretty obvious u never experienced 100+ fps in bf3 so its useless to discuss with u. when u will get those fps we will talk again about reactivity , that’s if u will ever admit it. try to curve a tv missile on 60fps and do it the same on 100 fps and u will see. cheers

            • Matt

              It’s an unnecessary factor to stay competitive… keep your snooty attitude to yourself and shut up because no one cares. If your best case is TV missiles to warrant the price of the build required to max out either BF3 or BF4 to maintain that FPS then so be it… your just a tool.

            • dumyspeed

              u dumb or what? mofo troll, i think u are the usual mad cry bob that accuse the other 63 players of cheating and so on .. pls cry more and grow up, TROLL.

              He was just asking on opinion, i gave it mine, u stfu

            • Matt

              Are you a kid… or mentally challenged. Y U TYPE LYKE DIS?!?

              You’re too stupid to gather my point… so you have to resort to some cryptic insult I still haven’t made sense of.

            • dumyspeed

              actually i’m orphan :(

            • Zheka

              Hahahaha! :D

    • Delta8A

      you’ll be fine on High.

      • Jamie Marques

        what about a 760? I’m asking because I think overall 760′s aren’t as good as some of the 600 series….

        • Matt

          It’ll work.

    • DanDustEmOff

      Get another graphics card, sli it and you should beast it.

    • xHDx

      How much RAM does your PGU have?

      • jaskdavis

        Da Fuq is a “PGU”? oh, a Processing Graphics Unit! ;)

    • Izzy Bozz

      you KNOW you’re good to go. You just felt the need to post your hardware specs on here. *wink, wink*

  • Delta8A

    my laptop is ready!

    • GunS

      what specs does it have? I also have a laptop but i’m not sure if i should buy it with my specs… the beta will be very decisive for this !

      • Delta8A

        Asus G750 with Nvidia 770M 3GB

  • SangheiliSpecOp

    My Xbox One is ready!

    • Zheka

      Ready for what? You don’t even have One.

      • SangheiliSpecOp

        :(

        • http://www.facebook.com/datkidfromawendaw Clay Johnson

          Wop wop wahhhhhhhh!

          • SangheiliSpecOp

            :)

            • http://www.facebook.com/datkidfromawendaw Clay Johnson

              Its okay dude, my Xbox one is ready too :)
              #feels

  • z0ml3ie P1kachu

    The big question is- can my 4gb MacBook Air this!? If not fuck you dice!

    /sarcasm

    I’ll be on Xbox not worrying about system specs

    • RECKLESSgoat

      hahahaha, my macbook pro can barely run Cod 4 xD

    • Charles Crowe

      And with an inferior version. You guys need to stop thinking of X1 or PS4 as desktop PCs. They are using mobile chips and already they are having problems getting BF4 to match the performance of quad core PCs

      • Tyler D

        Somebody had stupid for breakfast this mourning.

        • Charles Crowe

          Yeah maybe you can have something different tomorrow and stop being stupid? Why don’t you link your “unbiased” article from playstation blog?

          • Bob Gulihan

            Like IGN is the god of all sources. You are putting article on here that nobody in the professional community agrees with. It is a opinion and i put another opinion up next to yours. The game is not finished and you bash it. Then you say next gen consoles are equivalent to laptops. Really? That right there just proves you are the one who does not know what he is talking about. you just sound like a guy who spent 100 dollars on a PC and is butt hurt because you can get a awesome experience on BF with a 400 dollar console. GTFO

            • Charles Crowe

              Nah im just angry this isnt on the WiiU!! wtf are EA thinking!! this would easily sell more on the WiiU then all other platforms combined.

            • KevinMcClintock

              Mah considering a dual core PC can run it, any next gen console can, with less detail. I mean Vita is a quad core, PS4 is an 8core. The PS4 is only twice as powerful as a Vita and its running the game, though barely.
              Wii U is a Power PC based chip, which puts it closer to a desktop then PS4 is.

  • Pingback: Oficjalne wymagania sprzętowe gry Battlefield 4! » BF4info.pl

  • CoDforever

    I find it very funny that Killzone shadowfall was running on PS4 and it has better graphics than BF4 on pc

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-AnM_WaYUs

    • jaskdavis

      What? HA! NO! You mean it was shinier, But same texture detail and totally different art style, plus how large the maps are, destruction, player count, etc. is a lot more taxing then Killzone. You would need to compare Crysis to Killzone since that would make more since nub!

      • CoDforever

        what are you takling about ? cant you just accept the fact that the graphics look better like holy why do you guys always wanna defend battlefield

        • jj16802

          Well why do you have the need to attack the game?

    • jj16802

      Killzone: Shadow Fall is designed for 1 console in particular and has small maps with little to no destruction.

      Battlefield 4 has massive maps with destruction, vehicles, a larger player base and dynamic events to deal with as well as being a multiplatform game, taking away more time for development.

      The two games simply can’t be compared.

  • WarHero

    My PC specs:
    CPU: i7 3770k 3.5Ghz (OC 4.7Ghz)
    GPU: 2x Crossfire AMD 7990
    MoBo: ASUS Maximus V
    PSU: Corsair 1200w
    Hard Drive: 1TB Caviar Black
    SSD: Samsung SATA 250GB
    RAM: Corsair 16GB 2133Mhz

    I say BRING IT.

    • Tyler D

      Them specs are garbage. The wii u is more powerful. Long live nintendo. Who is with me.

  • Charles Crowe

    Wow and yet devs are already having to limit BF4 on PS4 and X1 because they use mobile phone chips.
    http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/08/23/gamescom-battlefield-4s-graphics-lacking-on-ps4
    This is going to upset a lot of uninformed fanboys that don’t understand tech but when a quad core PC with 4gigs of RAM is already showing its dominance to an 8core Mobile phone chip with 8 gigs of RAM, you know its only going to get worse as time goes on.
    Reading the comments below me is hilarious. You aren’t getting any of the things you guys claimed. to get 64 player online and 60FPS its going to look like BF3 on PS3

    • Bob Gulihan

      You are a true MORON of amazing limits. Read this article and shut the fuck up.

      http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-sony-details-final-ps4-spec

      “The spec also re-affirms a key, defining element of the PS4 hardware: its unprecedented 8GB of GDDR5 RAM. Bearing in mind that even the most expensive consumer-level PC graphics cards can’t match this allocation, it’s safe to say that Sony must be taking a substantial financial hit on this investment, but over the long term, it should pay off – on a general level, the more RAM that is available, the more future-proof the system is.”

      • Charles Crowe

        I dont know much about computers I only love the WiiU.

        • Tyler D

          Ok dude you got me i am lmao right now. Good trolling

        • Charles Crowe

          Actually kid I mainly game on a PC. You are trying just a little too hard but its hilarious that my comments hurt you that much that you need to pretend to be me….

          • Charles Crowe

            I love talking to myself. Someone reply to me already! I need attention.

            • KevinMcClintock

              That was obvious by how you pretend to be other people kid.
              Don’t worry some adult will touch you soon. You’ll get your wish

  • Baron Von Rhett

    Just need a new graphics card.

    OS: Windows 8 64bit
    Processor: Intel i7 3775k 8 core
    Memory: 12gb
    Graphics: Radeon HD 7770 Ghz Edition 2GB
    Hard Drive: 2TB+ 32 SSD

  • jj16802

    Hmmm, looks like my Radeon HD 6770 is good enough to run the game… but the question is should I wait until I get a PS4, which has a much better GPU?

  • austin

    i have winodws 8, and a amd 8320 8 core and going to be buying a 7950 so im am very excited :)

  • ChessMania

    There needs to be a Mac version…

  • Tyler D

    Since people want to throw up that stupid article about BF4 graphics lacking on PS4. i will throw this one up that contradicts everything that guy put in the article.

    http://blog.us.playstation.com/2013/08/22/hands-on-battlefield-4-on-ps4/

    • KevinMcClintock

      Yeah I am sure PS blog would openly admit its inferior..
      If you want to post something valid, get it from an outside source

    • KevinMcClintock

      While EA and DICE have not confirmed what resolution the game will run at on next-gen consoles, for the purposes of this demo, it was running at a resolution higher than 720p, but not 1080p

      From the moment I sat down, I was surprisingly underwhelmed by the visuals. Instead of the crisp, detailed textures I’ve encountered this week on the PC version or other titles running on next-gen hardware, Battlefield 4 on PS4 looked soft and muddled

      is week’s PS4 demo did not include a full 64-player match or the franchise’s beloved vehicular combat. Instead, attendees were treated to a local 16-player match of Domination mode, which limited the play area to a small segment of the game’s freshly minted Paracel Storm map

      hmm now who do we believe a neutral 3rd party or the company trying to sell us a console that is nothing but 2 Vitas taped together

  • AtheistMason

    Recommended System Windows 8 64-bit…

    HUH? Windows 8? That shit sucks bad. Games running on Win8 tend to have a lower framerate

    • SamRock

      Nice setup there.. Yeah Alpha was not completely optimized (loading was damn slow).. However even on my old HD5670 card, I was able to get a decent FPS

    • http://thatk1d.tumblr.com/ eXsorbeo

      Windows 8 because of DX11.1 which will be very beneficial. Believe it or not, Windows 8 actually does improve performance though. I personally don’t see what sucks about Windows 8 and my games perform better than when I was on Windows 7.

      • AtheistMason

        Okay, maybe I’ll do a thorough comparison some day. :)

  • Charles Crowe

    Man my WiiU could easily run this on MAX graphics!

    • mechcell

      Yes, with about zero FPS (frames per second)

      • Charles Crowe

        Nah man you don’t know anything. WiiU is the Strongest console and its made by Nintendo so that means its the best. GTFO

      • KevinMcClintock

        Actually Mechcell, you really don’t know what you are talking about. Wii U is more powerful than Ps3 or 360 and both are getting the game.
        While that dude is a moron grasping at straws to try to trash people smarter then him, you aren’t much better by being ignorant and making really dumb claims.

      • KevinMcClintock

        If PS360 can run it no reason the Wii U cant.
        No reason to counter ignorance with more stupidity dude.

  • Pingback: Игровые новости | Утренние блиц-новости | Gameplayer

  • Nikhil

    Of Course its going to be great…..
    But for some one who play BF3 at 25 FPS at 640 resolution…..its not at alll
    and with BF4 i hardly doubt to get 15 Fps…..!
    But,its no doubt thats its the best games ever made…..1

  • Mike Limpus

    Oh thank god. I can run it.

  • Christie Clark

    This is my build:

    OS: Windows 8 64-Bit
    CPU: Intel Core i5-3470 (with packaged cooling only)
    GPU: OverClocked (1,150MHz) Gigabyte GTX 760 GDDR5- (2GB)
    PSU: Corsair 500Watts with 80 Plus
    RAM: 8 GB Corsair Vengeance Blue
    Motherboard: Asus P8-H77-I
    Memory: 500GB Western Digital Caviar Blue
    Case: Bitfenix Prodigy (with 2 installed fans)

    Currently I run BF3 at 1080p with 4xAA on Ultra for all settings at 70-90fps.

    Do you think I will be able to run BF4 on Ultra at at least 60fps considering that Nvidia cards run EA games better than ATI Radeon?

    Thanks for the feedback.

  • JayJay Tan

    I have a i i5-4670, coupled with 16gb ram and a windforce gtx 780 OC 3 gb. Can i run bf4 in ultra settings(1920*1080)?

  • Justin

    Will these system requirements be able to play BF4 as well as Watch Dogs and AC4?

    OS: Win 7 64
    CPU: Intel Core2 Duo E8500 @ 3.16GHz
    RAM: 4 GB
    VGA: GeForce GTS 450
    HDD: 10 GB
    DirectX: 11

settings

close