While this year’s Battlefield game hasn’t officially been given a name by EA or DICE, most people (including us) refer to it as “Battlefield 6” given the last entry in the franchise was Battlefield V (5). Well, if the latest rumor is anything to go by, DICE seems to be going with a super basic name, and calling Battlefield 2021 as simply “Battlefield.”
- Related Reading: Battlefield 2021 Survey Questions Being Sent Out by EA; Asks About F2P Mode, Clan System & More
This new bit of info has surfaced from reliable Battlefield and Call of Duty leaker Tom Henderson, who also posted details about the campaign, and more interestingly, what he calls “Abilities” for players in multiplayer that will act like Call of Duty’s Perks!
Per his “sources,” the rumor states that Battlefield (this year’s game) will take place 10 years from now, and is set in the modern/very near future, which gives DICE to implement weapons and vehicles being developed by the military today. This means Battlefield players can expect drones, tanks, jets, and all that stuf — which should be familiar with franchise vets. Allegedly, the setting is very similar to how the Call of Duty franchise released Black Ops 2 in 2021, with the game being set 10-15 years from its release.
As for the campaign, it’s said to feature a “revolutionary campaign” compared to past Battlefield games, and will focus on you (the player) and your specialist unit. You’ll even be able to choose which superpower you want to fight for (US and/or Russia). It also mentions that this year’s campaign will be a co-op experience as well, which should be a welcome change of pace for military first-person shooter campaigns.
As for the big one regarding multiplayer, it’s described as Battlefield 3/4 “on steroids,” with players being able to play as four different types of soliders. However, instead of just having unique gadgets for each class, players will also have different “abilities” similar to how Call of Duty Perks work. One example given was how a Scout soldier/class might have silent footsteps, where an Assault soldier might be able to sprint for longer durations.
Regarding the rumored battle royale mode, it’s said to be completely disconnected from the Firestorm name (and understandably why), and will adopt a new name.
Finally, there is a little bit of bad news, as the rumor also mentions that the reveal trailer (rumored to be coming in May) will not feature gameplay of any kind, and will be similiar to Battlefield V’s reveal trailer.
Same as with every rumor, take this one with a grain of salt. That said, Henderson’s track record has been reliable compared to other leakers, so that’s why you see it here on the site.
Outside of the possible bad title name, perks sound really bad. I really hope that henderson isn’t correct on that account but from his track record it seems unlikely.
I don’t get the names, it’s like gaming is just catching up to Hollywood with removing numbers, soft-rebooting stuff and making them out like they’re the “first”
Like Xbox One
God of War
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
I don’t get it, they’ve had opportunities to fix this and now here we are resetting again. It has become so messy and I guess a few years of not releasing a game wasn’t enough time to address it.
Everyone refers to BF5 as BFV (including DICE/EA I suppose), but in actuality there was a previous BFV called Battlefield Vietnam.
Also, BF5 is not the actual 5th game in the series. If you include Codename Eagle as the founder to the eventual Battlefield franchise, and disregarding any side-titles that went away from it being a “military shooter”
Codename Eagle
Battlefield 1942
Battlefield Vietnam
Battlefield 2
Battlefield 2142
Battlefield 3
Battlefield 4
Battlefield 1
Battlefield V (9th game in the series, 11th if you include Bad Company games)
I dunno what to call the next Battlefield game, but I sincerely hope they don’t simply call it “Battlefield”. Though they seem to be doing like Microsoft did with their horrible naming of the Xbox consoles (Xbox, Xbox 360, Xbox One lolwut?!?)
I don’t mind perks, as long as balance and fun, no disturbance from cheaters.
I have a hunch these “perks” will be like the field upgrade things we saw in BF4. Remember those?
Wouldn’t be shocked if they just renamed them, yep. Not that they were any good anyways. Hardline also had them. Lots of good stuff to use, but often took to long to get to take real advantage of. I don’t want them if it’s to spice up the last 5 minutes of a match with only the top few players getting them.
You should mind them as they’ll fundamentally change the game as well as create balance problems they had yet to solve with base 4 classes. Fix and master what you got before you add.
You should mind them as they’ll fundamentally change the game as well as create balance problems they had yet to solve with base 4 classes. Fix and master what you got before you add.
Please be not true! I would be sad to see it become more like CoD.
Can anyone confirm whether or not there will be an Instant Action mode? (Conquest matches with AI Bots just like we could in Battlefield 1942 through 2142)?
If they confirm it as a YES I will pre-order it the moment it’s available !!!
Indeed. A “PVE mode” that isn’t Campaign related would be a welcome (return) addition. Certainly the AI must’ve improved in recent years, for a “Bot mode” to be viable?
For abilities, I truly hope they don’t give Scouts a “silent footsteps” passive. If anything, it should be something more akin to a choice of 2 abilities for that “tier” :
“Tread lightly” : Reduce the range players hear your footsteps by X amount.
“Muzzle it” : Reduce the range that players detect your muzzle flashes / shots fired on map by X amount.
There should never be a passive ability that simply eliminates completely something that could give such a huge advantage to the player using it. Reduce the chance of detection, or reduction of range for the footsteps to be heard is fine. But Scout players should have to make a choice between if they want to be more silent in close quarters combat, or less detected at long range.
If these rumors are true (the sooner we know for sure, the better), then I support the idea of abilities added passively to each class, as long as they are balanced properly, and not overpowered vs other classes. “Silent footsteps” would be very OP.
Yeah this way of doing it i would actually be okay with.
Cause that is what will draw the Battlefield crowd. Call of Duty features.
They do know that if people wanna play CoD, that they just play CoD and not Battlefield to play CoD?
Stop making sense.
Stop making sense.
DOA. Another Battlefield V that I just won’t be interested in.
Quit trying to be someone else. You haven’t mastered what made Battlefield good yet.
DOA. Another Battlefield V that I just won’t be interested in.
Quit trying to be someone else. You haven’t mastered what made Battlefield good yet.